Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Puss in Boots 2011 - Review by Mail Online

Puss In Boots (U)
Verdict: Far from purrfect
Rating: 2 Star Rating
This is a 3D spin-off of the Shrek films and has as its hero that legendary swordsman Puss in Boots, seductively voiced by Antonio Banderas.
It is also an origins story, explaining who the ferocious feline was, pre-Shrek.
Impeded and aided by romantic interest Kitty Softpaws (Salma Hayek, phoning in her performance) and a bad egg, in the form of his childhood friend Humpty Dumpty (Zach Galifiniakis, underpowered), Puss goes on a quest to steal magic beans from a pair of thugs called Jack and Jill (a wasted Billy Bob Thornton and Amy Sedaris). 

SCROLL DOWN FOR TRAILER
 
Let's dance: Puss and Kitty, voiced by Antonio Banderas and Salma Hayek) in the DreamWorks Animation Puss In Boots
Let's dance: Puss and Kitty, voiced by Antonio Banderas and Salma Hayek) in the DreamWorks Animation Puss In Boots


With these beans, Puss hopes to grow a magic beanstalk, climb up it and steal the legendary goose that lays the golden eggs.
But up in the clouds, he encounters not the giant from Jack And The Beanstalk but something even more terrifying: Mother Goose.
Though Puss was an entertaining subsidiary character in Shrek 2, he fails to convince as a leading character.


He’s vocally monotonous, and lacks the self-loathing complexity of Shrek and the naive charm of Donkey.
Too many of the jokes depend on adult humour about his sexual prowess.
And I’m unconvinced that gags about jail-rape and Fight Club have any place in a children’s film.
Australian premiere: Antonio Banderas (left), Salma Hayek and Dreamworks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg pose with Puss in Sydney
Australian premiere: Antonio Banderas (left), Salma Hayek and Dreamworks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg pose with Puss in Sydney


The pace is crippled by inordinately lengthy exposition and repetitive use of flashbacks.
Only the eye-popping action sequences are fun, especially the climb up the beanstalk and a chase along dangerous cliffs.
Puss In Boots is blessedly less dependent on insider showbiz jokes than Shrek 3 and 4 and marks a return to the basics of the series — an irreverent take on fairy stories.
However, the script is nowhere near the quality of the first two Shrek films, seriously lacking in wit and comic punchlines.
You could, if you were given to lame puns, describe it as paw.

Friday, December 16, 2011

Puss in Boots 2011 - Review by Guardian

Puss in Boots – review

This prequel to the Shrek cartoon franchise, with Antonio Banderas as the heavily accented cat of the title, is an entertaining, if not rip-roaring spin-off
3 out of 5 
guardian.co.uk,
    A still from Puss in Boots – rechristened 'Cat in Boots' for UAE audiences
    Claws out ... Puss in Boots
     
    1. Puss in Boots
    2. Production year: 2011
    3. Country: USA
    4. Runtime: 90 mins
    5. Directors: Chris Miller
    6. Cast: Amy Sedaris, Antonio Banderas, Billy Bob Thornton, Salma Hayek, Zach Galifianakis

    It hasn't been that long since Antonio Banderas startled audiences with his role as the sexually obsessed cosmetic surgeon in Almodóvar's The Skin I Live In. Now he is back in a more wholesome, if hardly less predatory and calculating role. This is a spin off from the awe-inspiringly lucrative Shrek franchise, and Banderas is reprising his voice work for the animated character Puss in Boots, or as he breathily announces it, poooooshh eeeen booohhtsshh. This solo adventure is a prequel, showing his early life, and it plays out like Sergio Leone Lite. Puss in Boots is now in Mexico, very far from the European forests where he is to meet Shrek. The young feline was brought up in an orphanage (like Kung Fu Panda, he may yet meet his parents) and it is as a kitten that he first meets his deeply unreliable best pal, Humpty Dumpty, voiced by Zach Galifianakis, and they form an outlaw duo. Humpty has the film's best line. Terrified of being captured by the authorities, he stammers: "Do you know what happens to eggs in jail? Well … it ain't over easy!" PiB has some love interest: a sparky relationship with a sneak thief named Kitty Softpaws, voiced by Salma Hayek. It's all amiable stuff, with a perfectly decent script, and the feline hero lapping his milk gets an indulgent laugh. Perhaps not if you're a dog person.

Friday, December 9, 2011

Puss in Boots 2011 - Review by The Telegraph

U cert, 90 min. Dir Chris Miller Starring Antonio Banderas, Salma Hayek, Zach Galifianakis
The Shrek series began as a satire on Hollywood’s appropriation of fairy-tale imagery, so it’s ironic that it went on to become a latter-day Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs, yielding an average of £471 million per film.
Now that particular goose has been cooked, Puss in Boots is DreamWorks Animation’s attempt to spin off an equally lucrative replacement – although, disappointingly, it has more in common with the drab, smug third and fourth Shrek films than with the spikily enjoyable first two.
Set before Puss meets Shrek – not that it seems to make any meaningful difference – this film follows the feline swashbuckler (voiced by Antonio Banderas) as he hunts for a pouch of magic beans, with help from a standard-issue Girl Power sidekick, Kitty Softpaws (Salma Hayek), and his childhood friend Humpty Dumpty (Zach Galifianakis). These beans are currently in the possession of Jack and Jill, who for reasons not immediately apparent are a pair of fat, ugly, middle-aged outlaws.
Most of the jokes in Puss in Boots fit into two categories: “Ha ha, he’s Spanish” and “Ha ha, he’s a cat”. Mildly tedious cat humour is an internet staple and the film pitches at exactly that level: it’s all too easy to picture the film’s six writers in a West Hollywood branch of Starbucks, slouched round a MacBook and cackling at YouTube. Many of the gags, including a studenty crack about “medicinal catnip”, are aimed straight over young viewers’ heads.


By

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Puss in Boots 2011 - Review by Twitch Film

Puss in Boots 2011 - Review by Twitch Film

fter being milked as second banana to a farting ogre in what seems like umpteen "Shrek" movies, Antonio Banderas' popular Puss in Boots has strayed into a movie of his own. Considering how that franchise has supposedly come to a close, this spin-off is, yes, a crassly commercial method of Dreamworks Animation continuing to generate green from green. But there's a good reason the cat came back to the silver screen in a film all his own as opposed to, say, The Gingerbread Man, Donkey, or Princess Fiona.

Puss in Boots is part Eastwood-ian Man With No Name, part Latin lothario, but all cat. Early in the film, we witness our dashing lead character in action as he coolly takes command of a bar stocked with looming louts and thick-necked thugs. Self-satisfied, he struts out into the night, only to be confronted with an old world equivalent of a zippy laser pointer beam - one with his name on it! And just like that, all that cool warriors' self-assuredness falls away as Puss instantly becomes nothing but what he's been all along - a cat. In this case, a cat frantically trying to catch an uncatchable beam of light - an uncontrollable compulsion for any feline, real or computer animated.

And there you have it, the primary universal joke of the character. His very essence, his very being, is his weakness. Puss in Boots, for all his valiant swaggering and swashbuckling, can be, on the fly, reduced to a common house cat. It is at once simple, obvious, hilarious, clever and universally relatable. After all, who among us has not been done in on occasion by the flaws of our own intrinsic humanity? This is the fundamental concept/conceit at the heart of Puss in Boots, and the key to any continuing viability and appeal of the character. Thankfully, it's something that this movie (boasting executive production credits for Guillermo del Toro and Andrew Adamson, among others) is smart enough to run with.

"Puss in Boots" falls just short of the original "Shrek" in terms of overall solidity, but avoids the pit of pop culture reference overload that the franchise fell into with the admittedly fun "Shrek 2", and never climbed out of. It's sharp and witty enough for adults and children to enjoy alike, even if the comedy takes a backseat to a barrage of nursery rhymed action movie tropes in the final reel. (And there's at least one joke for grown-ups (a quick, veiled pot joke) that may cause parents to squirm just a little.) It's an uneven film that gets off to a great start only to be sidetracked by a lengthy flashback sequence. I've seen it happen to worse movies, ones that couldn't boast such wonderfully plush and colorful animation.

Banderas dominates as Puss in Boots, a character who's skin he lives in quite comfortably. It's a perhaps rare pay-off to Dreamworks Animation's troubling tendency to stock their films with celebrity vocal talent, many of whom have no business being within fifty feet of that recording booth. (We're looking at you Cameron Diaz.) The same compliment, however, cannot be said of female lead Salma Hayek, who, for the first time in her career, is completely flat. No joke, she cannot deliver a joke. On the other hand, professional jokester Zach Galifianakis (in an almost joke-free part) does a respectable job as the dubious Humpty Dumpty, whose great fall was more of a moral one in this universe. Even executive producer del Toro gets in on the action, voicing the important but smaller part of the mustached Comandate.

After stinking up the litter box with a lot of crap features in the past decade, Dreamworks Animation seems to have finally landed on its feet this year, as evidenced by this film and the even better "Kung Fu Panda 2". They're still not in the league of Pixar, but this is credit given where credit is due. "Puss in Boots" is an exciting and clever ball of yarn, even as it makes absolutely no attempt to even resemble the French fairy tale it takes its name from. But it also has the good sense to avoid any gratuitous cameos from other "Shrek" characters, thus allowing "Puss" to stand on it's own two legs as much as possible. It's not purr-fect, but it's also not mangy.

by Jim Tudor / ref: http://twitchfilm.com

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Puss in Boots 2011 - Review by Cinema Blend

Puss in Boots 2011 - Review by Cinema Blend

3.5 STARS

http://www.cinemablend.com


Since his introduction in Shrek 2, Puss in Boots has been a fun character to watch, from the swagger that comes with being voiced by Antonio Banderas to his inherent ability to use his “cute kitty” powers. But does he have the ability to carry a movie by himself? It turns out that the answer is a pretty enthusiastic, “Yes.”

In his first solo adventure, Puss in Boots goes on what seems to be an impossible mission, as he attempts to steal the legendary magic beans from the villainous Jack and Jill (Billy Bob Thornton, Amy Sedaris) and ascend the beanstalk so that he can pinch The Goose That Lays The Golden Eggs. Along for the journey is Puss’ half-brother Humpty Dumpty (Zach Galfianakis), with whom he has a sordid past, and Kitty Softpaws (Salma Hayek), the greatest thief around.

Puss in Boots director Chris Miller was also responsible for Shrek the Third, but this film feels more like the first Shrek in its ability to appeal to both older and younger audiences. While some jokes will go over the young ones’ heads and some are a little too immature for the parents to laugh at, the movie is at its best when using absurdity to make the entire audience laugh at the same. There are some truly strange moments in the film – from a highly choreographed dance-fight to Humpty and Puss collecting beans as children (and I mean every kind of bean) – but it all strangely works.

The film also looks stunning, with 3D that perfectly captures the various landscapes, from the small villages to the high desert to the castle in the clouds. All of the characters are wonderfully textured, from the cat’s soft fur to Humpty’s hard shell, and the third dimension really makes you feel as though you can reach out and touch them. The most beautiful shot in the film is when the giant beanstalk grows, rising through a stunning aurora that will absolutely take your breath away.

But while Puss in Boots clocks it at a short 90 minutes even, there are pockets of the story that simply drag on too long. There are examples of this throughout the film, like a dance sequence around the campfire later in the movie, but the biggest culprit is Puss’ origin story, which is told in flashback. The brotherhood between the protagonist and Humpty Dumpty is important and Puss as a kitten is cute (adorable, actually), but it hurts the plot’s flow. While not catastrophic, tighter editing would have made the film work better as a whole.

Particularly in light of how disappointing both Shrek The Third and Shrek Forever After were, Puss in Boots is a revelation that could easily start a popular franchise all its own. Between last year’s How To Train Your Dragon and surprisingly solid Megamind, as well as Kung Fu Panda 2 from earlier this year, Dreamworks Animation is on a real roll and their newest film keeps that trend going.


ref: http://www.cinemablend.com


Reviewed By: Eric Eisenberg
movie reviewed rating

Puss in Boots 2011 - Rotten Tomatoes Review

Puss in Boots (2011) - Rotten Tomatoes Review

Tomatometer - 82%
 
Average Rating: 6.8/10
Reviews Counted: 94
Fresh: 77 | Rotten: 17
It isn't deep or groundbreaking, but what it lacks in profundity, Puss in Boots more than makes up for with an abundance of wit, visual sparkle, and effervescent charm.
Audience - 77%

Average Rating: 3.9/5
User Ratings: 31,284

ref: http://www.rottentomatoes.com 

Puss in Boots 2011 - IMDB Review

Puss in Boots (2011) ref: http://imdb.com

5,727 IMDb users have given a weighted average vote of 7.0 / 10
Demographic breakdowns are shown below.
Votes Percentage Rating
1,479 25.8%10
638 11.1%9
1,136 19.8%8
1,188 20.7%7
603 10.5%6
274 4.8%5
124 2.2%4
83 1.4%3
41 0.7%2
161 2.8%1
Arithmetic mean = 7.7.  Median = 8
This page is updated daily.

See user ratings report for:

Votes Average
Males  4,112 7.0
Females  1,402 7.5
Aged under 18  495 7.9
Males under 18  339 7.9
Females under 18  150 7.8
Aged 18-29  3,222 7.2
Males Aged 18-29  2,401 7.1
Females Aged 18-29  779 7.6
Aged 30-44  1,402 6.8
Males Aged 30-44  1,040 6.7
Females Aged 30-44  343 7.1
Aged 45+  441 6.7
Males Aged 45+  312 6.6
Females Aged 45+  120 7.7
IMDb staff  5 7.0
Top 1000 voters  45 6.1
US users  2,061 7.0
Non-US users  2,206 6.9
 
IMDb users  5,727 7.0